The approved task
Instruction, owner, agent identity, delegation, scope, and expiration.
task.id · delegation.idBuild an evidence trail that connects the authority to act with the changes made in your business systems.
Use this refund example to identify the records, permissions, and control points to review for your own workflow.
Explore the reference packetInstruction, owner, agent identity, delegation, scope, and expiration.
task.id · delegation.idActing agent, requested operation, parameters, timestamp, and result.
taskId · correlationIdTransaction records or audit events collected from the affected system.
receipt.id · correlationIdAgree on the event boundary and identifiers before connecting a workflow. Preserve original records so an investigator can trace a finding back to its source.
Record who authorized the task, which agent can act, and the allowed tools, amounts, resources, and time window. Preserve the delegation chain when one agent hands work to another.
Example: a support reviewer authorizes one $180 refund. The support agent delegates to a payment agent with the same limit and a defined expiration.Capture the requested operation and parameters, agent identity, result, and event time. Carry the task and correlation IDs through the call so later evidence can be joined to the request.
Example:refund.create reports success for $180.Collect receipts or audit events from the system where the change occurred. Check the actual amount, object, count, and status against the authorized task.
Example: two different posted refund IDs total $360. The action report alone does not establish this outcome.Compare a matched refund, a duplicate, and a missing receipt. The example distinguishes an action that was permitted from an outcome supported by collected records.
Use the synthetic examples to explore the fields, up to 100,000 characters. Checks run in your browser; this inspector sends no packet contents to a server.
A successful tool response can coexist with a different business result. Compare the source records before closing the run.
These checks compare fields, scope, and amounts in an illustrative packet. Production verification also needs authenticated sources, reliable collection, and appropriate evidence coverage. This reference format is not a production API contract.
Set access around the evidence you need and the action you intend to control.
Start with the minimum read-only access needed to inspect task records, runtime events, and downstream audit or transaction records.
Enforcement requires a supported interception point before the action executes. A read-only audit connection cannot stop a write.
The sources and hooks above are integration requirements to assess for your environment. Supported connections and the exact enforcement boundary are agreed for the selected workflow.
Bring one workflow, its runtime, and the business system it changes. Use the review to establish a connection plan and measurable acceptance criteria.
Evaluate SpektrisIdentify the workflow owner, agent runtime, systems of record, available APIs or event exports, and service accounts. Establish correlation IDs, collection frequency, expected volume, and who maintains each connection.
Agree where collectors and controls will run, the required network paths, and how service credentials are issued, scoped, rotated, and revoked. Confirm supported deployment options against the selected environment.
Identify the exact fields collected, where evidence is processed and stored, who can inspect it, and the required retention, export, and deletion rules. Define treatment of secrets and sensitive records before collection begins.
Test matched outcomes, unexpected effects, missing records, duplicate delivery, expired delegation, and unavailable controls. Measure evidence coverage, investigation time, human-review effort, and operational overhead against the existing workflow.