AI ASSURANCE SOFTWARE

Put AI agents
to work at scale.

Give your team the evidence to say yes.

Spektris Assurance Center connects agent instructions, delegated actions, policy decisions, and business-system records. Investigate what happened, verify the result, and give agents more responsibility with confidence.

For teams moving agent workflows into business operations.

Assurance CenterInteractive example
AGENT WORKFLOW

Resolve a customer refund

In scope
Refund up to $250scope v1
Authorized taskResolve a customer refund
01
Requested action$180 refund
02
Scope decisionWithin agreed scope
03
Observed outcomeRefund recorded
04
Inspect the evidence
refund.create

Payment-system receipt

The payment record links back to the requested refund.
Illustrative data. Explore how a workflow moves from task to outcome.
From “it ran” to “we know what changed.”Authority → action → business outcome
BUILT AROUND THE WORK
YOUR BUSINESS NEEDS DONE
Customer operationsFinancial workflowsSoftware delivery
THE SPEKTRIS ASSURANCE CENTER01 / FOLLOW THE WORK

The agent says “done.”
What actually changed?

A support agent was asked to refund $180. It reports success. The payment system shows $360. Follow the instruction, delegation, tool calls, and receipts to see exactly where the outcome diverged.

ASSURANCE CENTER / INVESTIGATIONInteractive example
CASE EXAMPLE-1042

One task. The complete record.

Needs review
05 / POLICY FINDING

Outcome needs investigation

The agent reports success. Two tool calls and two payment receipts show $360 refunded against a $180 instruction. Review the duplicate before the workflow runs again.

Rule
At most 1 refund · $180
Finding
Extra refund detected in example
Comparison
Instruction ↔ tool events ↔ receipts
APPROVED$1801 refund
OBSERVED$3602 posted refunds

Outcome needs investigation

The agent reports success. Two tool calls and two payment receipts show $360 refunded against a $180 instruction. Review the duplicate before the workflow runs again.

Inspect the linked recordsJSON
{
  "illustrative": true,
  "scenario": "duplicate",
  "task": {
    "id": "EXAMPLE-1042",
    "instruction": "Refund one customer payment",
    "approvedAmountUsd": 180,
    "allowedRefundCount": 1
  },
  "authority": {
    "id": "EXAMPLE-A01",
    "issuedBy": "Support reviewer",
    "delegatedTo": "Support agent",
    "scope": "One refund of $180 against payment EXAMPLE-P01"
  },
  "delegation": {
    "id": "EXAMPLE-D01",
    "parentAuthorityId": "EXAMPLE-A01",
    "from": "Support agent",
    "to": "Payment agent",
    "taskId": "EXAMPLE-1042",
    "allowedTool": "refund.create"
  },
  "toolEvents": [
    {
      "id": "EXAMPLE-T01",
      "taskId": "EXAMPLE-1042",
      "delegationId": "EXAMPLE-D01",
      "tool": "refund.create",
      "amountUsd": 180,
      "at": "2026-01-15T10:00:01Z",
      "result": "success"
    },
    {
      "id": "EXAMPLE-T02",
      "taskId": "EXAMPLE-1042",
      "delegationId": "EXAMPLE-D01",
      "tool": "refund.create",
      "amountUsd": 180,
      "at": "2026-01-15T10:00:03Z",
      "result": "success"
    }
  ],
  "agentReport": {
    "tool": "refund.create",
    "amountUsd": 180,
    "reportedStatus": "success"
  },
  "businessEvidence": {
    "source": "Illustrative payment ledger",
    "receipts": [
      {
        "id": "EXAMPLE-R01",
        "taskId": "EXAMPLE-1042",
        "amountUsd": 180,
        "status": "posted"
      },
      {
        "id": "EXAMPLE-R02",
        "taskId": "EXAMPLE-1042",
        "amountUsd": 180,
        "status": "posted"
      }
    ],
    "totalUsd": 360
  },
  "verification": {
    "verdict": "mismatch",
    "labels": "Outcome needs investigation"
  },
  "policyFinding": {
    "rule": "At most one posted refund, totaling no more than $180",
    "observedRefundCount": 2,
    "observedAmountUsd": 360,
    "result": "exception"
  },
  "investigation": {
    "decision": "Escalate the duplicate refund for review",
    "nextStep": "Review both tool calls and payment receipts before deciding on remediation.",
    "automaticRemediation": false
  }
}
Illustrative data. Explore all six stages or change the outcome.
Know who could actKeep instructions and delegated authority in context.
See what changedCompare agent activity with business-system evidence.
Make the next callResolve an exception with a record your team can inspect.
BUILT FOR THE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE RESULT02 / OPERATE WITH CONFIDENCE

Make every rollout
easier to stand behind.

When agents cross tools, teams, and systems, the facts get scattered. Spektris brings those facts into one assurance workflow, so operating decisions start with the same evidence.

01

Reconstruct the work

Follow the instruction, delegated authority, and tool actions behind a business change.

02

Investigate exceptions

Compare the intended outcome with observed records. Surface mismatches and missing evidence.

03

Keep reviews grounded

Give engineering, operations, and governance a connected record for the decision.

04

Expand on evidence

Use workflow results and measured review effort to decide where more autonomy makes sense.

THE EXECUTIVE QUESTION

“Can we give this workflow more responsibility—and explain why?”

Connect the operating evidence to the rollout decision.
A CLEAR PLACE IN YOUR STACK03 / CONNECT THE EVIDENCE

Your agents do the work.
Spektris connects the record.

Start with the systems behind one consequential workflow. Connect the authority to act, the execution trail, and the independent record of the business effect.

THE INSTRUCTION

Authority & delegation

Task ID, agent identity, permitted actions, limits, and the chain of delegation.

THE EXECUTION

Agent & tool events

Correlated requests, timestamps, results, policy decisions, and approvals.

THE BUSINESS EFFECT

Independent records

Payment receipts, system audit events, and evidence of the change that posted.

Spektris Assurance Center

Authority, execution, and observed effects in a connected investigation.

Instruction → action → effect

Give your technical team the details. Review the record requirements, access boundaries, and a downloadable reference packet.

Read the integration guide
MAKE THE SOFTWARE EARN ITS PLACE

Less time reconstructing.
More capacity to operate.

Start with an agent workflow you already run. Model what better evidence could change in review and investigation effort, then test those assumptions in your environment.

BEFORE → AFTER

Review effort

Hours spent checking whether agent work matched the task.

BEFORE → AFTER

Investigation effort

Hours spent assembling records and resolving exceptions.

QUALITY CHECK

Verified outcomes

Completed work supported by the evidence your team requires.

INVESTMENT CASE

Net capacity value

Value of time released, less platform, operating, and rollout costs.

BUSINESS CASE PLANNEREditable assumptions

Measure the value of better oversight.

Compare review and investigation effort for an agent workflow you already run. Set a target, then include the added costs of using Spektris.

Count review and investigation separately to avoid counting the same hours twice. Effort released = current hours − target hours.

Include software fees, added AI or infrastructure usage, and ongoing administration in annual costs. Rollout includes integration and training. Enter 0 only when that cost is zero.

YOUR WORKFLOW, AT YOUR TARGET
20staff hours released per month
$14,400annual capacity value, before added costs
Current effort60 hours/month
Target effort40 hours/month

Add both cost estimates to see first-year net capacity value and the effort reduction needed to break even.

Evaluate on your workflow

This planning scenario uses your assumptions. Capacity value estimates staff time available for other work at your hourly rate; it does not imply cash savings. First-year net capacity value subtracts the annual recurring and one-time costs entered. Validate these assumptions during evaluation.

SEE SPEKTRIS IN YOUR OPERATING CONTEXT

Bring one workflow.
See the whole story.

See how Assurance Center connects the records behind a task, makes an exception inspectable, and supports the next operating decision.

  1. 01
    Explore the productWalk through authority, delegation, actions, policy findings, and business effects.
  2. 02
    Check the fitIdentify the records and connection points your workflow needs.
  3. 03
    Define a bounded evaluationAgree on one workflow, success measures, responsibilities, timeline, and commercial terms.
Share the one-page overview

Prefer a direct conversation? ryan@spektris.ai

See Spektris for your workflow

Bring one agent workflow. See the evidence your team needs to give it more responsibility.

Loading verification…

For follow-up about your workflow. Please share only non-sensitive details. About this form

Ryan JohnsonFounder & CEO, Spektris
ACCOUNTABLE AUTONOMY

Giving agents more responsibility starts with being able to explain the work. Spektris is building the operating foundation for teams ready to take that next step.

ANSWERS FOR YOUR BUYING TEAM

Clarity before
commitment.

See the product
What is Spektris?

Spektris is AI assurance software for teams putting agents to work in business operations. Assurance Center connects instructions and delegated authority to execution events, policy findings, and observed business effects, giving teams a shared record for investigation and review.

What does it add to identity controls and agent traces?

Identity controls establish who can access a system. Agent traces describe execution. Spektris brings authority, execution, and downstream business records into the same investigation so your team can assess whether the resulting effect matched the task.

Which workflow should we start with?

Choose a consequential agent workflow with a clear business result and accessible system records. Refunds, payment operations, and software changes are useful examples. Start where reviewers spend time reconstructing activity or where evidence gaps make expansion difficult.

How does it connect to our environment?

The integration guide shows the required record types and correlation fields. Read-only access supports observation of source records. Stopping an action requires a separately integrated control point in the execution path. The evaluation establishes the exact connections, permissions, and data handling for your environment.

How should we measure value?

Compare review and investigation effort before and during an evaluation of the same workflow. Track the quality and completeness of the evidence alongside time released. Include software, operating, and rollout costs in the investment decision. The planner above makes those assumptions explicit.

How do pricing and an evaluation work?

Agree on the workflow, required integrations, evaluation scope, timeline, and commercial terms before kickoff. The demo is the starting point for an evaluation your technical and business owners can assess together.

MAKE THE NEXT ROLLOUT AN EASIER YES

More responsibility.
A stronger basis for trust.

Request a demoShare with your team